JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.55 756-760 November 1990.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mendel, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mendel, L. L.

A Sindscal Analysis of Perceptual Features for Consonants Produced by Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Talkers

Philip C. Doyle 1, Jeffrey L. Danhauer 2, and Lisa Lucks Mendel 2

1 Vocal Function Laboratory, School of Human Communication Disorders Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia
2 Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara

This study was concerned with the perceptual responses of normal-hearing listeners to consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal (TE) talkers and a single talker who was proficient in both of these alaryngeal speech modes. The listeners' perceptual responses were analyzed using Symmetric Individual Differences Scaling (SINDSCAL) to determine whether distinctive feature differences existed between these two methods of alaryngeal speech. This a posteriori analysis revealed that primary features retrieved for both speech methods included sibilant, affricate, dental, nasal, and sonorant. Although greater perceptual weightings were observed for TE speech, these productive/perceptual features were weighted similarly for both speech methods. Some secondary group-specific feature differences were also observed, but these features did not contribute substantially to the total amount of variance accounted for in the analysis. Thus, the SINDSCAL results showed that the groups did not use different feature systems. These results are discussed in regard to the unique alaryngeal speech production methods employed by esophageal and TE talkers and the relative limitations of the alaryngeal (esophageal) voicing source they use. General clinical implications of the data are discussed.

Key Words: alaryngeal speech • multidimensional scaling • SINDSCAL • esophageal speech • tracheoesophageal speech

Submitted on July 7, 1989
Accepted on January 16, 1990







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.