JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.55 621-627 November 1990.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tye-Murray, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tye-Murray, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tyler, R. S.

Effects of Repair Strategies on Visual Identification of Sentences

Nancy Tye-Murray 1, Suzanne C. Purdy 2, George G. Woodworth 3, and Richard S. Tyler 2

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City
2 Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City
3 Department of Statistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City

This investigation determined whether information elicited by repair strategies enhances an individual's ability to lipread a misperceived sentence. Five groups of subjects were each assigned one of five repair strategies: (a) asking the talker to repeat a sentence, (b) simplify it, (c) rephrase it, (d) say an important keyword, and (e) speak two sentences. Subjects viewed sentences spoken by six different talkers. When a subject did not recite a sentence verbatim, the talker performed the assigned repair strategy and then repeated the original sentence. A control group of subjects saw only the original sentence repeated twice. All five test groups demonstrated a significantly greater improvement for the second presentation score (referenced to the first presentation score) than the control group. The benefits provided by the repair strategies were independent of the talker, and benefits did not differ significantly among the groups.

Key Words: speechreading • repair strategy • lipreading • communication strategy • aural rehabilitation

Submitted on May 23, 1989
Accepted on November 13, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
S. R. Easterbrooks
Knowledge and Skills for Teachers of Individuals Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Initial Set Revalidation
Communication Disorders Quarterly, November 1, 2008; 30(1): 12 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
S. R. Easterbrooks
Knowledge and Skills for Teachers of Individuals Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing: Advanced Set Development
Communication Disorders Quarterly, November 1, 2008; 30(1): 37 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.