Taxonomies in Biology, Phonetics, Phonology, and Speech Motor Control

¹ Department of Speech Pathology & Audiology, University of Iowa

This article begins with a review explaining the different purposes of biological taxonomies. Taxonomic units are often dependent on the purpose for which the taxonomy has been constructed. Biological taxonomies provide an analogy that we use to emphasize some of the distinctions among the units of phonetic transcription systems, competence phonologies, and performance phonologies. The units of both phonology and phonetic transcription are considered as possible units of the speech motor system, and some of the difficulties of this assumption are explained. Although phonemic units, like units of phonetic transcription, are useful for many purposes, it is not theoretically necessary to use units derived as part of competence phonologies in systems attempting to explain phonological performance or speech motor performance. In this regard, we challenge the concept of coarticulation, because it is based on assumptions about the role of phonological or phonetic units in speech motor control. We offer an integrated perspective that has implications for research in speech motor control and deficits of the speech motor system. We see speech motor deficits as distinct from, yet possibly interacting with, phonological deficits.

Key Words: phonetics • phonology • articulation • taxonomy • disorders

Submitted on May 10, 1989
Accepted on February 20, 1990

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. W. Powell The Use of Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments for Developmental Speech Sound Production Disorders: Interventions and Interactions Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 374 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Masterson and D. L. Daniels Motoric versus contrastive approaches to phonology therapy: a case study Child Language Teaching and Therapy, January 1, 1991; 7(2): 127 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]