JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.55 550-560 August 1990.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yorkston, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yorkston, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Traynor, C. D.

The Effect of Rate Control on the Intelligibility and Naturalness of Dysarthric Speech

Kathryn M. Yorkston 1, Vicki L. Hammen 1, David R. Beukelman 2, and Charlie D. Traynor 1

1 University of Washington, Seattle
2 University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Speaking rates of individuals with severe ataxic dysarthria (n=4) and severe hypokinetic dysarthria (n=4) were reduced to 60% and 80% of habitual rates using four different pacing strategies (Additive Metered, Additive Rhythmic, Cued Metered, and Cued Rhythmic). Effects of rate control on sentence and phoneme intelligibility and speech naturalness were examined. Sentence intelligibility improved for both groups, with metered pacing conditions associated with the largest improvement in scores. Similar improvements as speaking rates were reduced were not seen for the phoneme intelligibility task; however, one must recognize that sentence and phoneme intelligibility tasks are different. Slowing the rate of dysarthric speakers did not have as marked an impact on speech naturalness as it did for normal speakers whose naturalness decreased at slowed rates. Metered rate control strategies were associated with the lowest ratings of naturalness for all subject groups. A potential explanation for the discrepancies between the findings for sentence and phoneme intelligibility is offered.

Key Words: communication • dysarthria • speaking rate • intelligibility • naturalness

Submitted on September 15, 1989
Accepted on December 6, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. C. Hustad and J. Lee
Changes in Speech Production Associated With Alphabet Supplementation
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1438 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. E. Huber and B. Chandrasekaran
Effects of Increasing Sound Pressure Level on Lip and Jaw Movement Parameters and Consistency in Young Adults
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1368 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Racette, C. Bard, and I. Peretz
Making non-fluent aphasics speak: sing along!
Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2571 - 2584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.