JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.55 468-475 August 1990.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Demetras, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Demetras, M. J.

The Identification of Language Impairment in the Selection of Specifically Language-Impaired Subjects

Rebecca J. McCauley 1 and M. J. Demetras 2

1 Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Vermont, Burlington
2 Division of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Arizona, Tucson

This review focused on the methods used to identify language impairment in specifically language-impaired subjects participating in 72 research studies that were described in four journals from 1983 to 1988. The single most frequent source of information used in the identification process was found to be test data. There was, however, considerable variability and, often, a lack of clarity regarding the specific number and identity of tests used. More specific findings on test use indicated that researchers routinely assessed both expressive and receptive language and that they used incomplete tests. When test scores used in identification and selection were examined, there was a wide range of score types, and age-equivalent scores were by far the most common and often the only type of score utilized. Conclusions are drawn regarding the impact of these findings on the interpretation and generalizability of this research literature.

Key Words: specific language impairment • research methodology • subject selection • diagnosis

Submitted on August 25, 1989
Accepted on November 7, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
C. S. Watson, G. R. Kidd, D. G. Horner, P. J. Connell, A. Lowther, D. A. Eddins, G. Krueger, D. A. Goss, B. B. Rainey, M. D. Gospel, et al.
Sensory, Cognitive, and Linguistic Factors in the Early Academic Performance of Elementary School Children: The Benton-IU Project
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2003; 36(2): 165 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
T. W. Powell and M. J. Germani
Linguistic, Intellectual, and Adaptive Behavior Skills in a Sample of Children with Communication Disorders
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 1993; 11(2): 158 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. M. Aram, R. Morris, and N. E. Hall
The Validity of Discrepancy Criteria for Identifying Children with Developmental Language Disorders
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 1992; 25(9): 549 - 554.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.