JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.53 316-327 August 1988.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamhi, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gentry, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamhi, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gentry, B. F.

Phonological and Spatial Processing Abilities in Language- and Reading-Impaired Children

Alan G. Kamhi 1, Hugh W. Catts 2, Daria Mauer 1, Kenn Apel 3, and Betholyn F. Gentry 1

1 Memphis State University, Memphis, TN
2 University, of Kansas, Lawrence
3 Whittier College, Whittier, CA

In the present study, we further examined (see Kamhi & Catts, 1986) the phonological processing abilities of language-impaired (LI) and reading-impaired (RI) children. We also evaluated these children's ability to process spatial information. Subjects were 10 LI, 10 RI, and 10 normal children between the ages of 6:8 and 8:10 years. Each subject was administered eight tasks: four word repetition tasks (monosyllabic, monosyllabic presented in noise, three-item, and multisyllabic), rapid naming, syllable segmentation, paper folding, and form completion. The normal children performed significantly better than both the LI and RI children on all but two tasks: syllable segmentation and repeating words presented in noise. The LI and RI children performed comparably on every task with the exception of the multisyllabic word repetition task. These findings were consistent with those from our previous study (Kamhi & Catts, 1986). The similarities and differences between LI and RI children are discussed.

Submitted on July 17, 1987
Accepted on October 21, 1987




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. F. Stokes and T. Klee
The Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Test of Early Nonword Repetition for Differentiating Late Talking and Typically Developing Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 872 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
B. A. Lewis, L. A. Freebairn, A. J. Hansen, L. Miscimarra, S. K. Iyengar, and H. G. Taylor
Speech and Language Skills of Parents of Children With Speech Sound Disorders
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2007; 16(2): 108 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. B. Leonard, S. Ellis Weismer, C. A. Miller, D. J. Francis, J. B. Tomblin, and R. V. Kail
Speed of Processing, Working Memory, and Language Impairment in Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 408 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Graf Estes, J. L. Evans, and N. M. Else-Quest
Differences in the Nonword Repetition Performance of Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2007; 50(1): 177 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. M. D. Archibald and S. E. Gathercole
Nonword repetition: a comparison of tests.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 970 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. F. Stokes, A. M-Y. Wong, P. Fletcher, and L. B. Leonard
Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: the case of cantonese.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 219 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
K. Strattman and B. W. Hodson
Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 2005; 21(2): 165 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
C. B. Gill, J. Klecan-Aker, T. Roberts, and K. A. Fredenburg
Following directions: Rehearsal and visualization strategies for children with specific language impairment
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 2003; 19(1): 85 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. E. Watkins, N. F. Dronkers, and F. Vargha-Khadem
Behavioural analysis of an inherited speech and language disorder: comparison with acquired aphasia
Brain, March 1, 2002; 125(3): 452 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. H. Allor, D. Fuchs, and P. G. Mathes
Do Students With and Without Lexical Retrieval Weaknesses Respond Differently to Instruction?
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 2001; 34(3): 264 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
B. A. Lewis and L. Freebairn
Speech Production Skills of Nuclear Family Members of Children with Phonology Disorders
Language and Speech, January 1, 1998; 41(1): 45 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
A. Talay-Ongan
Infants' phonemic awareness and receptive language profiles: a follow-up study
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 1996; 12(2): 99 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. M. Mauer and A. G. Kamhi
Factors That Influence Phoneme---Grapheme Correspondence Learning
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 1996; 29(3): 259 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. G. Kamhi, H. W. Catts, and D. Mauer
Explaining Speech Production Deficits in Poor Readers
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 1990; 23(10): 631 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.