JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.53 302-315 August 1988.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoel-Gammon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoel-Gammon, C.

Prelinguistic Vocalizations of Hearing-Impaired and Normally Hearing Subjects

A Comparison of Consonantal Inventories

Carol Stoel-Gammon 1

1 University of Washington, Seattle

Phonetic transcriptions of 48 babbling samples from 11 normally hearing subjects, aged 4–18 months, and 39 samples from 14 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects, aged 4–39 months, were analyzed to determine the inventory of consonantal phones for each recording session. Group comparisons revealed that inventories of the hearing-impaired subjects were generally smaller than those of the hearing infants and that they evidenced little change in size prior to 20 months. Analysis of place and manner of articulation of supraglottal phones in the inventories showed that, compared with inventories of the normally hearing subjects, inventories of HI subjects with sensori-neural loss tended to have (a) a higher proportion of labial consonants; (b) a higher proportion of prolongable consonants such as nasals, glides and fricatives, and syllabic consonants; (c) a lower proportion of alveolars; and (d) a lower proportion of stops and nonsyllabic affricates. Differences were also observed between the inventories of hearing-impaired subjects with sensori-neural loss and those with conductive loss and between younger and older hearing-impaired subjects. These findings suggest that hearing loss affects the nature of the consonantal repertoire in the prespeech vocalizations of hearing-impaired subjects.

Submitted on May 19, 1987
Accepted on September 30, 1987




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
D. von Hapsburg, B. L. Davis, and P. F. MacNeilage
Frame Dominance in Infants With Hearing Loss
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 306 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
D. J. Ertmer, N. M. Young, and S. Nathani
Profiles of Vocal Development in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 393 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
D. v. Hapsburg and B. L. Davis
Auditory Sensitivity and the Prelinguistic Vocalizations of Early-Amplified Infants.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 809 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
V. L. Lewedag, D. K. Oller, and M. P. Lynch
Infants' vocalization patterns across home and laboratory environments
First Language, January 1, 1994; 14(40): 049 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
V. L. Lewedag, D. K. Oller, and M. P. Lynch
Infants' vocalization patterns across home and laboratory environments
First Language, January 1, 1994; 14(42-43): 049 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.