JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.53 271-279 August 1988.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hyland, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weismer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hyland, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weismer, G.

The Effects of Three Feedback Modes on the Ability of Normal Geriatric Individuals to Match Speaking Rate

Jennifer D. Hyland 1 and Gary Weismer 1

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison

The present study investigated the effects of three feedback modes (visual-verbal, verbal-quantitative, and verbal-qualitative) on the ability of 30 normal geriatric individuals to match three different speaking rates (slow, average, and fast). Ten subjects were randomly assigned to each feedback condition. Each subject was instructed to produce the stimulus phrase, Buy Bobby a doughnut, at each of the three speaking rates. Subjects in the visual-verbal mode received both visual feedback of the utterance duration via a PM Trainer and verbal feedback from the experimenter indicating the subject's accuracy in matching the specified speaking rate. Feedback during the verbal-quantitative condition consisted of verbal information indicating the subject's accuracy in matching each speaking rate. The verbal-qualitative condition consisted of verbal feedback relative to the subject's ability to match speaking rate, although the feedback was less precise than in the other conditions. Results suggest that visual-verbal and verbal-quantitative feedback lead to significantly better performance than verbal-qualitative feedback in matching speaking rate, particularly when the task becomes more difficult. These results have implications for the training of a similar task in speech-disordered populations.

Submitted on March 27, 1987
Accepted on September 28, 1987







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.