| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
2 Illinois State University, Normal
Single-subject research designs, with their concentration on the individual subject over extended time durations, are similar in form to the design of therapy and have been represented as the best, if not the only, appropriate method for carrying out clinical research. Despite the similarity between single-subject research sessions and clinical sessions, it is argued that such designs are not intrinsically more appropriate than group designs for clinical research. Single-subject and group research strategies are alternative and often competing approaches to the same research question, and the choice resides as much in the predilections of the researcher as in any intrinsic advantage in one or the other research strategy.
Submitted on August 20, 1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Onslow, M. Jones, S. O'Brian, R. Menzies, and A. Packman Defining, Identifying, and Evaluating Clinical Trials of Stuttering Treatments: A Tutorial for Clinicians Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 401 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Records and A. L. Weiss Clinical Judgment : an Overview Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1990; 13(2): 153 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Dunn Integrated Related Services for Preschoolers with Neurological Impairments: Issues and Strategies Remedial and Special Education, May 1, 1989; 10(3): 31 - 39. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |