JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.51 252-259 August 1986.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calculator, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Delaney, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calculator, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Delaney, D.

Comparison of Nonspeaking and Speaking Mentally Retarded Adults' Clarification Strategies

Stephen N. Calculator 1 and Dianne Delaney 2

1 University of New Hampshire, Durham
2 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Interactions between speaking and nonspeaking persons using communication boards have frequently been found to be plagued by conversational breakdowns. Previous investigators, drawing upon anecdotal evidence, have painted a scenario in which the nonspeaker confuses the listener by transmitting an ambiguous message, the listener then requests clarification, the nonspeaker fails to clarify, and the discourse is abruptly terminated.

The present study examined 5 speaking and 5 nonspeaking moderately-severely mentally retarded subjects' responses to their Listeners' requests for clarification. An informal conversational format was used to evoke 40 possible repairs from each subject. Few differences were noted with respect to the ways in which speaking and nonspeaking subjects revised or failed to revise their messages. Both groups were highly responsive to their listeners' requests for clarification; subjects rarely ignored or changed the topic of discourse following these listener requests. However, unlike previous reports of nonretarded normally developing language-disordered children operating at comparable mental and linguistic levels, these speaking and nonspeaking subjects generally repeated their ambiguous messages rather than revising them. The results indicated the need to develop techniques for teaching speaking and nonspeaking retarded adults alternate methods of repairing conversational breakdowns.

Submitted on August 13, 1985
Accepted on March 21, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 LSHSSHome page
I. J. Stockman, L. Karasinski, and B. Guillory
The Use of Conversational Repairs by African American Preschoolers
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2008; 39(4): 461 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Focus Autism Other Dev DisablHome page
Y. Ohtake, M. Yanagihara, A. Nakaya, S. Takahashi, E. Sato, and M. Tanaka
Repair Strategies Used by Elementary-Age Beginning Communicators With Autism: A Preliminary Descriptive Study
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, January 1, 2005; 20(3): 158 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. Reichle
Communication Intervention with Persons Who Have Severe Disabilities
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1997; 31(1): 110 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.