Flexibility of Single-Subject Experimental Designs. Part III

Using Flexibility to Design or Modify Experiments

¹ Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
² American Medical International, Atlanta, GA

The purpose of this paper is to present clinical researchers with viable alternatives to basic, prototypical single-subject experimental designs. The availability of these alternatives is a product of the flexibility inherent in the application of these designs. Two general types of flexibility are discussed: (a) a priori flexibility, as in combining designs in one study and (b) ad hoc flexibility in which a design is modified during the course of a study. The flexibility afforded by the designs provides the opportunity to fashion individual experimental designs for specific research problems addressed. A review of the clinical research literature published during the last 10 years revealed that the flexibility of these designs has been underutilized. The benefits that can derive from using the potential flexibility of the designs are described, and specific suggestions are made for incorporating flexibility into clinical research.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kiran Typicality of Inanimate Category Exemplars in Aphasia Treatment: Further Evidence for Semantic Complexity J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1550 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Edmonds and S. Kiran Effect of Semantic Naming Treatment on Crosslinguistic Generalization in Bilingual Aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 729 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]