JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.51 204-214 August 1986.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, K. P.

Flexibility of Single-Subject Experimental Designs. Part II

Design Selection and Arrangement of Experimental Phases

Kevin P. Kearns 1

1 North Chicago Veterans Administration Medical Center

The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomy of single-subject experimental designs and discuss relevant examples that underscore the versatility and flexibility of this approach to clinical research. The proposed taxonomy serves as a heuristic model that may facilitate an understanding of single-subject experimental designs. Four general evaluation strategies employed in applied research—treatment-no treatment comparison, component assessment, treatment-treatment comparison, and successive level analysis—are discussed within this schema. Each of these evaluation strategies is related to commonly posed clinical research questions, and published examples of design options that address these questions are presented. Throughout the discussion basic considerations relating to appropriate design selection are reviewed.

Submitted on June 26, 1985
Accepted on March 25, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
D. C. Millar, J. C. Light, and R. W. Schlosser
The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 248 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J E Janosky
Use of the single subject design for practice based primary care research
Postgrad. Med. J., September 1, 2005; 81(959): 549 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
E. Skarakis-Doyle and L. Murphy
Discourse-Based Language Intervention: An Efficacy Study
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1995; 17(2): 11 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
M. Houston and D. G. Bachor
Comparing two methods of teaching single words in context
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 1994; 10(2): 153 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
J. E. Janosky
Use of the Nonparametric Smoother for Examination of Data from a Single-Subject Design
Behav Modif, July 1, 1992; 16(3): 387 - 399.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.