JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.49 287-292 August 1984.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orlansky, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bonvillian, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orlansky, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bonvillian, J. D.

The Role of Iconicity in Early Sign Language Acquisition

Michael D. Orlansky 1 and John D. Bonvillian 2

1 Ohio State University
2 University of Virginia

A longitudinal study of sign language acquisition was conducted with 13 very young children (median age 10 months at outset of study) of deaf parents. The children's sign language lexicons were examined for their percentages of iconic signs at two early stages of vocabulary development. Iconic signs are those that clearly resemble the action, object, or characteristic they represent. Analysis of the subjects' vocabularies revealed that iconic signs comprised 30.8% of the first 10 signs they acquired. At age 18 months, the proportion of iconic signs was found to be 33.7%. The finding that a majority of signs in the subjects' early vocabularies were not iconic suggests that the role of iconicity in young children's acquisition of signs may have been overrated by some investigators, and that other formational features may be of greater importance in influencing young children's ability to acquire signs.

Submitted on August 19, 1983
Accepted on June 7, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
E. Ormel, D. Hermans, H. Knoors, and L. Verhoeven
The Role of Sign Phonology and Iconicity During Sign Processing: The Case of Deaf Children
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., October 1, 2009; 14(4): 436 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
T. D. Tolar, A. R. Lederberg, S. Gokhale, and M. Tomasello
The Development of the Ability to Recognize the Meaning of Iconic Signs
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., April 1, 2008; 13(2): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 First LanguageHome page
J. C. Johnston, A. Durieux-Smith, and K. Bloom
Teaching gestural signs to infants to advance child development: A review of the evidence
First Language, June 1, 2005; 25(2): 235 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Language and SpeechHome page
S. Peperkamp and J. Mehler
Signed and Spoken Language: A Unique Underlying System?
Language and Speech, June 1, 1999; 42(2-3): 333 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 First LanguageHome page
J. D. Bonvillian and F. G.P. Patterson
Early sign language acquisition in children and gorillas: vocabulary content and sign iconicity
First Language, January 1, 1993; 13(39): 315 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 First LanguageHome page
R. J. Folven, J. D. Bonvillian, and M. D. Orlansky
Communicative gestures and early sign language acquisition
First Language, June 1, 1984; 5(14): 129 - 143.
[Abstract]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.