Hypothesis-Testing and Nonlinguistic Symbolic Abilities in Language-Impaired Children

¹ Memphis State University, Tennessee
² Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio
³ Cleveland Heights-University Heights Schools Cleveland Heights, Ohio

This study sought to clarify further the cognitive abilities of language-impaired children by examining their hypothesis-testing and nonlinguistic symbolic abilities. A discrimination learning task and a concept formation task were used to measure hypothesis-testing abilities, and a haptic (touch) recognition task was used to assess nonlinguistic symbolic abilities. Subjects were 10 language-impaired and 10 language-normal children matched for performance Mental Age. Measures of expressive and receptive language were also obtained from each child. The language-impaired children were found to perform significantly poorer than their MA controls on the haptic recognition task and on a portion of the discrimination learning task. No differences were found between the two groups' concept formation abilities. Correlational analyses revealed a particularly strong positive relationship between performance on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and the haptic recognition task. It was speculated that this relationship was motivated by the symbolic demands of these tasks. One implication O f this speculation is that a symbolic representational deficit might better explain the receptive language deficit than the expressive one.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Mainela-Arnold, J. L. Evans, and M. W. Alibali Understanding Conservation Delays in Children With Specific Language Impairment: Task Representations Revealed in Speech and Gesture J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1267 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Powell and M. J. Germani Linguistic, Intellectual, and Adaptive Behavior Skills in a Sample of Children with Communication Disorders Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 1993; 11(2): 158 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]