JSHD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders Vol.44 321-330 August 1979.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Saxman, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Saxman, J. H.

A Comparison of Language Samples Elicited at Home and in the Clinic

Claudia A. Kramer, Sharon L. James and John H. Saxman

Syracuse University, New York

Abstract

One of the most common methods of obtaining diagnostic information about a child's language production is to collect and analyze a spontaneous language sample. Usually, this sample is collected in a clinical setting by a speech-language pathologist. Because children's language production seems very sensitive to situational variables, there is some question about the representativeness of language samples obtained in clinical settings. This study compared language samples obtained in the home by the mothers with those obtained in the clinic by speech-language pathologists. Subjects were three- to five-year-old children who had been referred for speech and language diagnostics. Results were that the children's mean-length-of-utterance (MLU) scores were better for the home sample, although there was no difference between their Developmental Sentence Scores (DSS) for the home sample and the clinic sample. The home samples yielded higher MLU stage placements (Brown, 1973) and higher estimated language ages on the DSS (Lee, 1974) for most of the children. Clinical implications of the results are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
T. T. Smith, E. Lee, and H. L. McDade
An Investigation of T-Units in African American English-Speaking and Standard American English-Speaking Fourth-Grade Children
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2001; 22(3): 148 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
L. B. Yonovitz and K. R. Andrews
A Play and Story-Telling Probe for Assessing Early Language Content
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1995; 16(2): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
S. Bacchini, F. Kuiken, and R. Schoonen
Generalizability of spontaneous speech data: the effect of occasion and place on the speech production of children
First Language, January 1, 1995; 15(44): 131 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
S. Tonn and A. Van Kleeck
The Quality of a Language Sample as a Function of Its Placement in an Assessment Battery
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 1986; 9(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
P. M. Hargrove, C. Holmberg, and M. Zeigler
Changes in spontaneous speech associated with therapy hiatus: a retrospective study
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, January 1, 1986; 2(3): 266 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.